Science believes in only what can be seen.
So when something has been rendered invisible through force for centuries, it becomes easy for those who control science and want to fool people, to not give it the stamp of 'science', because it can't be seen, so it must not be there. Yes, I'm talking about the sexual need of men, that they call 'straight' in the west, for other men.
And, similarly, when they want to give their stamp to something that is not really there, but we can still see them, because of the illusion created by the society, those who control science easily give it the stamp of science and further fool people into believing the thing exists.
Like the concept of 'sexual orientation' and 'heterosexuality'.
June 19, 2008
May 9, 2008
Difference between Love and Lust
(1) Sex, when it is purely physical, with no bonding, no love and care, no sense of togetherness -- it is highly negative and evil. Not that it shouldn't be tolerated in a society or not given space. However, when this is promoted by a culture above 'sex that goes with love and bonding' -- then it becomes problematic.
And when you suppress/ kill the positive attributes of love in a population -- take the case of the third sex which has been banished from the society into the fringes -- what remains is negative and evil lust. That is why the gay community is based purely on sex -- it lives and thrives on sex and it is promoted by the third-sex gay culture. In fact third sex males who like men, have been, since the times of the ancient Greeks, being known to be lusty and into multi-partner unattached sex. It is not that members of the third sex don't feel love. Its only that the love part has been killed by the society -- which holds such a relationship abhorable (in this case receptive anal sex). So what remains is the negative lust, which the society allows with a demeaning, negative identity/ social space. The 'gay' label carries with it the stigma of this demeaning, negative identity.
(2) In case of male-female sex, the traditional society has been making a difference between sex that is purely lust, and sex which is more "love". However, even love between men has been castigated by the same society as "carnal desire" and "lust", and therefore castigated by the society as it would lust.
And when you suppress/ kill the positive attributes of love in a population -- take the case of the third sex which has been banished from the society into the fringes -- what remains is negative and evil lust. That is why the gay community is based purely on sex -- it lives and thrives on sex and it is promoted by the third-sex gay culture. In fact third sex males who like men, have been, since the times of the ancient Greeks, being known to be lusty and into multi-partner unattached sex. It is not that members of the third sex don't feel love. Its only that the love part has been killed by the society -- which holds such a relationship abhorable (in this case receptive anal sex). So what remains is the negative lust, which the society allows with a demeaning, negative identity/ social space. The 'gay' label carries with it the stigma of this demeaning, negative identity.
(2) In case of male-female sex, the traditional society has been making a difference between sex that is purely lust, and sex which is more "love". However, even love between men has been castigated by the same society as "carnal desire" and "lust", and therefore castigated by the society as it would lust.
January 1, 2008
Post your Miscellaneous notes here
You can Post miscellaneous notes about any issue that directly or indirectly affects men.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)